We used published reports (see Table 2) and our histology and micro-CT data to assign
mechanical properties and dimensions to the soft tissues, bone, and fibrous interzone. In the intact palate, the boundary conditions of nursing and tongue activity were assigned, where nursing exerted a downward-directed, uniform pressure on the palate ([34] and see green arrow, Fig. 2A) and tongue activity exerted an upward-directed, uniform pressure on the palate PLX4032 ([35] and see red arrow, Fig. 2A). The discretized mesh was generated according to the pressures applied (Fig. 2B). The distribution of hydrostatic strain and distortional strain were then determined (Fig. 2C). The FE model indicated that the intact midpalatal suture complex was under negative hydrostatic strain (Fig. 2D) and a small but significant amount of distortional strain (Fig. 2E). These data are consistent with the formation of chondrogenic tissues [45], which we observed at the ends of the palatine processes (see Fig. 1A). We then modeled the strain distributions on PID1 (Fig. 2F). Based on published reports, the wound region was assigned an initial biaxial tensile stress of magnitude = 0.05 MPa in the X and Y directions [46] and the width of the midpalatal suture complex was 116 μm, the same buy Epacadostat as in the intact case (see Fig. 1).
In this scenario, the palate was affected by the biaxial contractile stresses resulting from the wound healing, as well as the nursing and tongue pressures as modeled in the intact palate. FE results demonstrated that on PID1, the injured midpalatal suture
complex was primarily exposed to positive hydrostatic strain (Fig. 2G) and distortional strain (Fig. 2H), the values of which were significantly higher than in the intact state (Figs. 2D, E). Therefore, under conditions of wound healing, tongue pressure, and nursing, the suture region experienced an appreciable positive hydrostatic strain (Fig. 2G) and even larger distortional strains (Fig. 2H) than heptaminol existed in the intact palate. These conditions do not favor the formation of either osteogenic or chondrogenic tissues in the suture region but instead, are known to promote the formation of fibrous tissues (Fig. 2M; [45]). This FE prediction correlated with histological data from the PID4 and PID7 analyses (Fig. 1). We had observed a disintegration/resorption of bone at the midpalatal suture complex at PID4 (Figs. 1I–L). We modeled this finding in an iterative manner, where the loss of mineralized tissue created a larger gap, measuring 200 μm in width. When nursing and tongue pressures were added to the effects of the wound contraction biaxial stresses, this resulted in appreciable negative hydrostatic strain (and stress; Fig. 2I) and somewhat smaller distortional strains in the midpalatal region (Fig.). This created a radically different mechanical environment, which is known to favor the formation of chondrogenic tissues (Fig. 2M; and [47]).