The data obtained in 2003 for the mean biomass of sipunculans in the southern and central Barents Sea (2.7 ± 0.9 g m− 2) correspond well with Denisenko (2003) as regards the mean biomass of Gephyrea in the north-central Barents Sea (2.6 ± 0.6 g m− 2). From the above, we can assume that the decrease in Gephyrea biomass in the last quarter of the 20th

century, as reported by Denisenko, also applied to the sipunculan fauna in the study area. An analogous connection can be traced within the main biomass-forming group of sipunculans in the Barents Sea – the species of the Golfingia genus (i.e. G. m. margaritacea in the studies of Denisenko BMS-907351 solubility dmso (2007), and G. m. margaritacea and G. v. vulgaris in ours). According to Denisenko (2007), the mean biomass of golfingian sipunculans in the northern and central parts of the sea decreased fourfold (from 27.5 ± 4.4 to 6.9 ± 0.9 g m− 2) from 1968–1970 to 2003 and in the southern and central parts of the sea by a factor of 3.5 (from 15.6 ± 4.7 to 4.4 ± 1.3 g m− 2) according to the 2003 data. Denisenko (2007) considered that the key reason for the 2003 decrease in sipunculan biomass that he recorded

was warming, observed in the Barents Sea from 1989 till the present Alectinib cost (Boitsov, 2006 and Matishov et al., 2009) (Figure 5). However, the data from the benthic research of 1996–97 (Garbul 2010) did not provide any compelling evidence to support this statement. The mean biomass of sipunculans within the study area according to the 1996–1997 data was estimated at 2.85 ± 1.12 g m− 2, which agrees statistically with the 2003 data (2.7 ± 0.9 g m− 2). Consequently, the decrease in sipunculan biomass in the central Barents Sea, registered both by Denisenko (2007) and ourselves, took place between 1970 and 1996, and is most likely not related to warming.

A sharp decrease (several times) in sipunculan biomass during the short period of positive temperature anomalies prior to 1996 seems unlikely. In fact, large macrozoobenthic organisms respond to hydrological fluctuations with a delay of a few years. So, for Golfingia m. margaritacea, there is evidence for a 6-year delay in biomass correlation with Docetaxel ic50 water temperature ( Denisenko 2007). Moreover, the available data leads to the following conclusion: the strong warming trend of the last 20 years has not affected the sipunculan biomass in the south-central Barents Sea, because there were no significant changes in this biomass during the 8-year period of extremely high positive temperature anomalies between 1996 and 2003 in the southern Barents Sea. Predation and the negative effect of bottom fishery are also factors that could have led to such a significant reduction in sipunculan biomass during 1970–1996. The most active predators include the large red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus), introduced into the Barents Sea in the 1960s, and the long rough dab (Hippoglossoides platessoides limandoides).