The Irish Sea Fisheries Board (BIM) – a public institution – applied itself to construct Europe׳s biggest salmon farm in Galway Bay in order to lease it out to other operators. NGOs argue that if instead of a government body, a private firm had applied for such a farm, it would never be able to receive the license for such massive production [29] (I13). Hence, their claim indicates that direct involvement of public authorities for the implementation of fish farms risk weakening the procedural rights of other stakeholders and generates a debate on participative justice. The Alta case, Norway, illustrates

conflicts between TSA HDAC supplier different public administrations as well. The owner of one fish farm already possessed several farms, but still desired to double his production in these locations. Local politicians were against this intensification and rejected the proposal. Following that, the owner appealed to regional politicians, who also opposed the intensification. Afterwards, the fish farmer applied to the directorate of fisheries, which overruled the local and regional political authorities and granted him the necessary permission. The NGO representative commented (I18): “when we put this in correlation

CP-868596 solubility dmso with other cases, we see the difficulty to stop the fish farms׳ expansion to new locations, and the impossibility to stop growth in already existing ones, as democracy has no way

of stopping [them].” His comments clearly hint at the participatory and procedural problems and the lack of a clear, democratic and inclusive decision-making mechanism in which all actors׳ opinions would count. The environmental injustices related to capabilities occur in various ways. In the analyzed cases where especially small-scale fishermen are active actors, there are concerns regarding social functioning, that is, the capabilities Palmatine of fishing communities as they become threatened with the gradual loss of their socioeconomic activity, culture and livelihood. Elaborating on the case of South Evoikos Gulf, Mente et al. [31] develop the argument that the aquaculture sector has expanded at the expense of other social and economic activities, negatively affecting the community structure. In this case, local people and fishermen claim a disruption of their activity and disturbance of their environment, which places greater costs on them while decreasing their capabilities and their coherent individual and collective functioning. The capabilities approach is related to the extent to which actors are indeed able to influence decisions as well. In the case of information asymmetries, different levels of power are embedded in social and economic relations, and privileged people likely have a greater access to the means of influencing the final decision.