In this study, various gene copy numbers of AVR-Pita1 were identi

In this study, various gene copy numbers of AVR-Pita1 were identified in most of the transformants. However, the level of avirulence of these transformants remained unchanged find more when compared with other transformants. In fact, all of the transformants became avirulent, suggesting that the position and arrangement of AVR-Pita1 had no effect on the level

of avirulence. Previously, Khang et al. [11] identified three members in the AVR-Pita gene family and confirmed the function of each member as well as their promoters by transferring different combinations of the coding regions and promoter regions. In their study, both AVR-Pita1 and AVR-Pita2 conferred avirulence on isolates virulent toward Pi-ta-containing rice cultivars but AVR-Pita3 failed to do so [11]. These findings are consistent with the predicted role of AVR-Pita1 as an elicitor interacting specifically with the Pi-ta protein in triggering resistance in plant cells [12] and [13]. Major R gene-mediated resistance can be robust and complete, but may not be long-lasting.

That Pi-ta has been defeated by race IE1k suggests an urgent need for exploring novel approaches. In this study, we altered isolates by converting isolates back to their presumed wild-type state. When this was done, the isolates were no longer able to infect Pi-ta-carrying cultivars. For the first time, we experimentally demonstrated that Pi-ta in the U.S. cultivars recognizes the original Olaparib mw AVR-Pita identified from a Chinese isolate O-137 and initially named AVR2-YAMO. Our findings also suggest that the development of a novel race carrying the AVR-Pita1 allele from isolate O-137 of the pathogen could allow the development of rice lines that have more effective, or durable, resistance

to the rice blast pathogen. We thank the University of Arkansas Rice Research and Promotion Board for financial support to Y. Dai; Barbara Valent of Kansas State University for plasmids PCB980 and PCB1003; Michael Lin, Ellen McWhirter and Tracy Bianco of USDA ARS DB NRRC; and Jin-Rong Xu of Purdue University ID-8 for the technical assistance. USDA is an equal-opportunity provider and employer. “
“Comprising approximately 50% of wheat gluten proteins, gliadins have essentially a plasticizing effect on gluten structure and mainly impart viscosity to dough [1]. Though it is generally concluded that gliadins exert mainly negative effects on overall dough strength, positive contributions of these proteins to loaf volume have also been detected [2], [3], [4] and [5]. Based on their mobility in the A-PAGE gels, as well as their different primary structures, gliadins can be divided into three groups: α-, γ- and ω-gliadins [6].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>