g western and southern sub-Saharan Africa, northwestern Europe,

g. western and southern sub-Saharan Africa, northwestern Europe, southeastern Asia), whereas genetic profiles with intermediate frequencies for several haplotypes are observed in central or connecting regions like East Africa and the Near-East. This suggests that human peopling history occurred in a centrifugal manner, i.e. from central to peripheral regions, with a loss

of see more diversity through isolation by distance.12 This scenario is suggested by Fig. 1 (a multidimensional scaling analysis of 82 populations, data compiled in ref. 12) where a continuous pattern of genetic variation is clearly visible, and is fully compatible with the spread of modern humans towards different continents from a central region including East Africa and the Near East. Besides this general finding at the global level, the study of the GM polymorphism has brought significant results at regional levels. In Africa, linguistics this website is a better predictor of the GM genetic structure of populations than geography: variation of GM haplotypes is clearly observed among populations whose languages belong to different linguistic

phyla of this continent; i.e. Afro-Asiatic (AA), Nilo-Saharan (NS), Niger-Congo (NC) and Khoisan (KH).13–15 It is therefore likely that the spread of populations speaking languages from each of these families had a significant impact on the patterns of GM genetic variation in Africa. In particular, the demographic and geographic expansion of the NC-speaking Bantu started in a region located between present Nigeria and Cameroon and expanded southward during the last 3000 years. Bantu people may have ‘pushed’ KH populations further south compared with www.selleck.co.jp/products/Staurosporine.html the large area previously occupied by the KH populations, which extended from northeast to southern Africa. Despite documented gene flow between Bantu and KH populations, the genetic profiles (here, for the GM polymorphism) observed in KH show that they retained an ancient genetic diversification. Interestingly, KH populations exhibit

moderate frequencies for one haplotype, GM 1,17 21, which is frequent in East Africa but rarely found elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, indicating that KH and East African populations share ancient relationships. The other African linguistic groups also exhibit a genetic profile compatible with linguistic classification: West Africans, whose languages belong, like Bantu, to the NC family, are genetically similar to Bantu, with very high GM 1,17 5* frequencies; also, AA populations from East Africa exhibit higher frequencies of GM 1,17 21 and GM 3 5* than other sub-Saharan African populations, which makes them closer than the other groups to populations from AA-speaking populations from North Africa and the Near-East.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>