E. The lungs were ventilated mechanically to maintain FGFR 1 normocarbia upright. AChange in h Hemodynamic variables compared to baseline was considered as significant and treated. All patients were interviewed after surgery atandh and asked if she felt faint or short of breath, muscle pain or discomfort was experienced and had an awareness of their pain may need during the induction of anesthesia. Any sign of R Tive maintenance or Se sequelae were recorded duringh. The main finding of this study was to identify differences in the scores RIP. Based on power analysis to detect a reduction of RIP in a significance level ofand power were Stichprobengr E been necessary programmed by group.patients least patients for the study and all data, analyzes without dropouts. Data are presented as mean differences or standard numerical terms.
All statistical analyzes were performed using A 922500 Diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 inhibitor SPSS for Windows version of SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA. The digital data on age, weight, H He was, h Hemodynamic variables analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test with post hoc Duncan test was used to the kind of categorical data, ASA status. RIP wounds were adjusted using a KruskalWallis test and significant difference in the Bonferroni Mann-Whitney U-test was used, p!. was considered significant. Patient characteristics were similar in all groups and are shown in the table. Endotracheal intubation was successful in all patients. The general H FREQUENCY been Of pain. in the placebo group. in the ephedrine group. in the group lidoca . do In the group lidoca No, it was mild or moderate pain was significantly lower than in the placebo group, p.
and p each. Although the H Of light FREQUENCY to m for take-hour pain was Forth in the ephedrine group than in the group lidoca Not that this difference was not statistically significant p. and p each. No patient in the lidoca Do and ephedrine groups had severe pain. Pain scores are shown in the table. MAP mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate values are presented in figure sand HR. Basic values of MAP and HR were comparable between the groups. Cards after the drug test and after induction were h Forth in the ephedrine group than in the lidoca And not in the placebo group, p. and p each. HR values after the drug test, after induction and after intubation were h Forth in the ephedrine group than in the lidoca And not in the placebo group or DPI.
Although these differences were statistically significant, they were not clinically relevant and is located in the three groups studied after a short time interval. No patient pr Sented arrhythmia and no one was treated for Human Resources or You change the MAP. None of the patients complained of sw Surface, shortness of breath or discomfort before induction of anesthesia. None of the patients had muscle aches, R obligations Or curves Followed se consequences for an hour. No patient recalled any pain or discomfort and no awareness of an experience of pain. Discussion This study demonstrated that rocuronium using the timing principle, Ephedrine pretreatment reduced the RIP compared to placebo, but was not as effective as ephedrine lidoca Thurs in anesthesia practice, rocuronium are preferred as an alternative non-depolarizing neuromuscular Re blocker succinylcholine in rapid sequence intubation. To reduce the effective