074, L colon segment; p = 0.073). Two subclasses of GARS scale had meaningful effect on bowel preparation: stress related to pressure caused by sickness or injury (p = 0.027), overall level of pressure during the past week (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Bowel preparation in right colon may be influenced by stress unfavorably, especially stress related to pressure caused by sickness or injury & overall level of pressure during the past week. We assume that stress alter colonic bowel motility during bowel preparation. Key selleck screening library Word(s): 1. Bowel preparation; 2.

stress Presenting Author: TERUHITO KISHIHARA Additional Authors: YOSHIROU TAMEGAI, AKIKO CHINO, MASAHIRO IGARASHI Corresponding Author: TERUHITO KISHIHARA Affiliations: Cancer Institute Hospital, Cancer Institute Hospital, Cancer Institute Hospital Objective: local excision for early rectal cancer, was selected surgical treatment as transanal Selleckchem DZNeP tumor resection (TAR) previously. However Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique

has made it possible to perform one-piece resection of colorectal tumors regardless of lesion size and location.Thus we compared the safety and curability between these treatments. Methods: ESD was performed for 48 cases of tumor. In same periods, we experienced 25 cases of TAR. We compared the Operative time, complication and residual/local recurrence between ESD and TAR. Results: We completed ESD procedure on 48 of 48 rectal tumors (particularly lower rectum), The average operation time was 125.5 minutes for ESD and 50.4

minutes for TAR. The complication of perforation was 0% and late bleeding was 4.3% with ESD. Thus, although there is no significant difference in the incidence of perforation between these endoscopic procedures. However one case Retroperitoneal emphysema has occurred in TAR and Hospitalization period of the patients was 22 days. This result revealed that ESD has become a very safe procedure than the TAR technique. Sclareol The incidence of residual/local recurrence was 0% with ESD, 8.0% (2/25) with TAR. Conclusion: ESD for colorectal tumors became safe and curative procedure owing to the progress of endoscopic technique and devices as compared with TAR. Key Word(s): 1. ESD; 2. TAR Presenting Author: MI JUNG LEE Additional Authors: YUN JIN CHUNG, HYUN SOO KIM, JAE KWON JUNG, DONG WOOK LEE, CHANG KEUN PARK, DAE JIN KIM, SANG DONG KIM, DONG HYUN KIM Corresponding Author: MI JUNG LEE Affiliations: Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu Fatima Hospital Objective: An adequate bowel preparation is critical for successful colonoscopy.