0001 0 0003 0 0001 0 0005 Chloroflexi 0 0036 0 0020 0 0012 0 0028

0001 0.0003 0.0001 0.0005 Chloroflexi 0.0036 0.0020 0.0012 0.0028 Spirochaetes 0.0012 0.0009 0.0005 0.0014 eFT-508 research buy Bacteroidetes 0.0029 0.0023 0.014 0.0032 Between species   d B 95% confidence intervals       lower upper Cyanobacteria 0.1427 0.1426 0.1235 0.1587 Chloroflexi 0.3409 0.434 0.2489 0.4087 Spirochaetes 0.3537 0.3541 0.2907 0.4017 Bacteroidetes 0.3779 0.378 0.3390 0.4099 Comparison of mean

distances in the different eubacterial phyla and the 95% confidence intervals of 10,000 mean values calculated from bootstrap samples. Confidence intervals do not overlap between cyanobacteria and the other eubacterial phyla. Distances of 16S rRNA sequences are significantly smaller in cyanobacteria compared to the other prokaryotes.d W and d B : mean calculated from the original dataset including all distances. and : mean of 10,000 means calculated using bootstrap sampling. In order to verify learn more the significance of our results for cyanobacteria, we compared phylogenetic and distance results from the cyanobacteria to three eubacterial phyla (Chroroflexi, Spirochaetes and Bacteroidetes). Figure 5 presents the Bayesian consensus find more phylogenetic tree and the distance matrix reconstructed for the phylum Chloroflexi. Trees and distance matrices for the phyla Spirochaetes, and Bacteroidetes are shown in Additional files

6, 7 and 8. Within the phylum Chloroflexi, species contain one to five 16S rRNA genes per genome. The phylogenetic tree is well supported by posterior probabilities. Previous phylogenetic studies have divided the phylum Chlorophlexi into several subdivisions [48, 49], the majority of which is supported by our inferred tree. Distances of the 16S rRNA sequences within

genomes and between species of Chloroflexi were significantly higher than found for cyanobacteria (Table 2). Mean distances of species belonging these to the phylum Chloroflexi were d W =0.004 within species, and showed a 10-fold difference compared to distances between species (d B =0.34). Chloroflexus auranticus and Chloroflexus sp. were the only species among the taxa analyzed in this study where 16S rRNA orthologs were more similar than their paralogs. Further comparison of mean distances for 16S rRNA sequences including phyla Spirochaetes and Bacteroidetes confirmed the significantly lower sequence variation in cyanobacteria. A comparison of the distributions of mean distances calculated from the bootstrap re-sampling show no overlap of the 95% confidence intervals of cyanobacteria and any of the other phyla (Additional files 4 and 5). Furthermore, within all studied phyla, mean distances for 16S rRNA gene copies within a genome (d W ) were smaller by at least one order of magnitude compared to mean distances for 16S rRNA sequences between species (d B ).

Comments are closed.