All the images were acquired at fixed camera and microscope settings for DNA and LNA with Nikon A1 confocal microscope. Fluorescence intensities were quantified by NIS elements (V 3.21.02) image analysis software (Nikon). The Signal to Noise (S/N) value is an indicator of sensitivity of the probe since it is a measure of both the signal and

the background. For this purpose no background correction was done, so that along with the actual signals of Portiera, the background noise of DNA and LNA could also be calculated for the same samples for 100 μm2 area respectively. S/N ratio value was obtained by dividing signal intensity with the background noise. Figure 3, where S/N ratio is plotted against increasing formamide concentration compares the two probes. EX 527 nmr The LNA probe had nearly twice as much S/N values as DNA probe, while detecting Portiera. The highest S/N value (823) was obtained with LNA probe at 60% formamide concentration. Use of high formamide concentration for LNA LCZ696 supplier probes in order to MK5108 cost reduce

the background noise, has been previously performed when detecting lactic acid bacteria [26]. In DNA probe the highest S/N value (334) was at 40% formamide concentration. It was evident from the graph that the LNA probe has higher signal and lower noise ratio than DNA at all formamide concentrations. At 0% formamide concentration even though the main signal Dynein is high, an equally high background noise

reduces the S/N ratio value in both DNA and LNA probes. In agreement to previous studies [12], we find that high sensitivity and stringency can be obtained by using LNA probes at high formamide concentrations while performing FISH in insect whole mounts. Figure 3 Signal to noise ratio of LNA and DNA probes while detecting the more abundant endosymbiont ( Portiera ). This graph depicts the signal to noise ratio, per 100 μm square area and plotted against increasing formamide concentration. No background correction was performed here. The value was calculated by dividing signal with the background of the same image and thus it gives a good idea about the binding efficiency of the probe. Here, LNA probe has a high signal to noise ratio at 60% formamide concentration followed by 30% formamide concentration, when compared to DNA probe. The signal of LNA probe is always high than the DNA probe at all formamide concentrations. Portiera was detected at 9 different formamide concentrations (0%-80%), both by DNA as well as the LNA probes. Fluorescence intensities were quantified by NIS elements (V 3.21.02) image analysis software (Nikon). Comparing LNA and DNA probes to detect Arsenophonus the secondary bacterial endosymbiont of Bemisia tabaci FISH detection of Arsneophonus 16 S rRNA was performed keeping all the conditions, but the laser settings, similar for DNA and LNA probes (Figure 4).