The amount of AP and NP production was stimulated by acidificatio

The amount of AP and NP production was stimulated by acidification, but the AP/NP ratio was not affected (Fig. 7). These phenomena may be due to an increase of CO2 supply into the cells and consequently the stimulation of the production of acid polysaccharides. Such active AP production also may stimulate JNK-IN-8 molecular weight Ca2+-uptake by demand of Ca2+ to produce CaCO3 crystals for coccoliths. Both cell size and coccolith production were affected by acidification with CO2 concentration (Fig. 4). Cell enlargement was also observed when coccolith production was strongly stimulated at low temperature (Sorrosa et al. 2005). As swelling of the cells were observed when cell growth was greatly

suppressed by nutrient-deficiency or cell damage (Satoh et al. 2009), cell enlargement by acidification with HCl to pH 7.2 might be due to cell damage. Satoh et al. (2009) and Kayano and Shiraiwa (2009) also reported that both coccolith and coccolith polysaccharide production were stimulated by phosphate deficiency from the medium, although the reason why cell size was enlarged by phosphate deprivation is still unclear. Very recently, Bach et al. (2013) RGFP966 supplier reported the results on analysis of impact of CO 2 and pH on the mechanism of photosynthesis and calcification in E. huxleyi and concluded that E. huxleyi is sensitive to low CO 2 and low bicarbonate as well as low pH beyond a limited tolerance range, but much less sensitive to elevated CO

2 and bicarbonate. These results nicely fit to our present results although the parameters determined experimentally in both studies were different. The experiments by Bach et al. (2013) were performed by following carbon chemistry exactly, and therefore, their results can be extrapolated to the real ocean to simulate how E. huxleyi will be affected by ocean acidification. The present study clearly proved the mechanism behind how and why calcification, namely coccoliths production, is stimulated at elevated CO2 conditions and inhibited under acidification.

Therefore, the combination of both papers is useful to understand how and why ocean acidification by increasing atmospheric CO 2 will affect the physiology of the coccolithophore E. huxleyi. In conclusion, the schematic model of the influence of acidification by acid (solid arrow) and by CO2 enrichment (open arrow) is shown in Fig. 8. The suppression of coccolith formation by acidification is shown to be Dapagliflozin due to the reduction of calcium uptake through the plasma membrane in E. huxleyi. On the other hand, photosynthetic machinery in the chloroplast was not affected by such acidification of the medium. This study proved that E. huxleyi cells have high potential of compensation to avoid damage of cells against acidification when acidification is caused by CO2 enrichment. This suggests that physiological activities of E. huxleyi cells will not be seriously damaged by ocean acidification at least up to 1,200 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere. However, as reported by Hoppe et al.

Comments are closed.