In sum, the result indicated that PLAG1 was a novel prognostic pr

In sum, the result indicated that PLAG1 was a novel prognostic predictor for HCC patients. Figure 4 The prognostic significance of KPNA2 and PLAG1 expression. Kaplan-Meier analyses of recurrence-free survival

(a) and overall survival (b) https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Y-27632.html in HCC patients stratified by KPNA2 expression status. Kaplan-Meier analyses of recurrence-free survival (c) and overall survival (d) in HCC patients stratified by PLAG1 expression status. The survival curves were compared using a Long-rank test. Table 3 The clinico-pathological characteristics of patients with positive KPNA2 expression when grouped by nuclear enrichment of PLAG1 Variate PLAG1 ▲ P-value Negative Positive All cases 53 99   Age (year), ≤60:>60 38:15 82:17 0.143 Gender, male:female 48:5 87:12 0.789 Child-Pugh, A:B 46:6 85:10 1.000 HBs antigen, positive:negative 47:6 86:13 0.803 HBe antigen positive:negative 7:46 22:77 0.201 AFP (ug/L), >20:≤20 20: 33 36: 63 0.862 Tumor size (cm), >5:≤5 30:23 67:32 0.005* No. tumor, Solitary:Multiple 44:9 81:19 0.607 Edmondson Grade, I + II:III + IV 3:50 8:91 0.748 Vascular invasion, Present:Absent 35:18 67:32 0.858 Micro-metastases, Present:Absent 41:12 72:27 0.566 ▲: PLAG1 status in tumoral tissues. *represents

statistical significance. The positive PLAG1 expression is the only predictor for survival of KPNA2-positive HCC Furthermore, we found that patients with positive KPNA2 and positive PLAG1expression (KpPp) in tumor have the poorest RFS and OS compared to other groups (Figure 5a-b), suggesting the combination of high KPNA2 and PLAG1 density in nucleus would add accuracy to predict the Selleckchem Anti-infection Compound Library prognosis of HCC patients. It is noteworthy that PtdIns(3,4)P2 the differential prognosis between PLAG1-negative HCC patients with positive

or negative KPNA2 staining shows no significance (Figure 5a, RFS: KpPn vs KnPn, p = 0.226; Figure 5b, OS: KpPn vs KnPn, p = 0.438), confirming the clinical importance of PLAG1 for the role of KPNA2 in HCC. However, for patients with positive KPNA2 expression, the status of PLAG1 in nucleus could significantly associate with tumor size (Table 3) and predict the RFS and OS (Figure 5a, RFS: KpPn vs KpPp, p = 0.001; Figure 5b, OS: KpPn vs KpPp, p = 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis was applied to determine that the positive PLAG1 expression was the risk factor for prognosis of HCC patients (Table 4) and the only risk factor for prognosis of HCC patients with positive KPNA2 expression (Table 5). Collectively, the results revealed that PLAG1 was essential for clinical significance of KPNA2 and would add accuracy to stratify HCC patients with poor prognosis. Figure 5 The prognostic significance of the interaction between KPNA2 and PLAG1. Kaplan-Meier analyses of recurrence free survival (a) and overall survival (b) of HCC patients divided into four subgroups described in Figure 3. The survival curves were compared using a Long-rank test. ★ represents statistical significance; NS represents no significance.

Comments are closed.